One time I was with a friend of mine and his wife. She is from Poland, he is not. We were discussing the relative differences of our three countries. Speaking about women behaviour I asked her:
-”And do Polish women also say ‘No’, meaning ‘Yes’?”.
She laughed, then answered “Yes” (meaning yes).
This issue of interpreting female answers is a big one. I remember some people suggesting that actually, at least for some women, “maybe” means “yes”, and “no” means “maybe”. Those people don’t usually understand a “No” unless they are slapped a few times over. And then they might still be unsure.
In my opinion and experience women will tell you “No” way more often than they mean it. Sometimes to save the face (not to look too easy, or like prostitutes). Sometimes because they are shy, or you have just been to direct. “Shall we go to my place and have sex” will generally provide you a “No” even when she wants it, unless a relationship is already underway. She just will never admit to such a direct request.
Which brings back us to the answer to what in me scares women. My whole life, is a direct request. My eyes, my beard, the intensity of my eyesight. Accepting it means to jump. And few are willing to do it.
But beside this recouring theme, it seems to me that there is another reason that makes women say “No” meaning “Yes”. Some women, will say “No” because they love men who don’t follow their directives. Let’s admit it, people who obey are boring. Are childish, don’t take responsability. Don’t risk. So here we have a women who consciously, but also often unconsciously, will say “No, No”. Meaning “Yes, but you need to take the responsability, and I will never admit I wanted it”. It is a dangerous game, and a game that can risk to go before a tribunal for rape or sexual harassment. And both parties, and the judge need to use their best discernment to understand if a “No” was really a “No“, or a “NyesO“. In some countries a women is not considered to have been raped unless she really offered resistance. Unless she slapped him, and did what was in her power to go away. For what might be worth I think of those as enlightened countries. Countries where it is honored the need for women to say a No which can actually be a Yes. When this is not the case (like in the US, or so I heard), men are more and more scared to risk and try. And the country is slowly developing Mama’s boys.
And then there is another issue. And is the fact that most women will follow the feeling of the moment more than anything else. And since this is subject to rapid change, a “No” at the some point of a meeting does not actually preclude a “Yes” later on. Sometimes in a non verbal form.
Few days ago I was in some woods with a girl. She telling me that she did not want to have sex with me. Half an hour later she was in my arms, with her legs relaxing open, her feet facing each other, the knees bent in the butterfly position while I was caressing her inner thight, and up up to the groin. She said No with her mouth before, but her body was telling a different story. I being blunt and straightforward avoided to caress her inner butterfly. When she realised I was not going to satisfy her completely she got up. It tooke me many sessions of meditation to get rid of the dream of what would have happened if I were a bit more in the here now, and a bit less in sharp truth of agreements.
Really sometimes what women say should be taken as an answer valid only in the moment. Not a definite statement.
26 August, 2006 at 3:40 pm
My first instinctive response is to say that it is a lot of bull shit about women saying no when they mean yes. There are quite a few american women that when they say NO really means a definite NO, and when they say YES it is a YES. But to be inconsistent, some women do exist that might say No when they mean Yes and that really screws things up for a woman who really, really means what she says. So it is not all bullshit.
As for me, when I say no, its a no thank you, but it is most definitely a no. I even had a date mention that I was very polite but it wasn’t that, it was just how definite I sounded. As for me, when I say yes, it could be a more generic yes but it could also mean an omg yesss. But I tend to say no more often than not as a general rule. Someone pressures me, automatic no and I am done with the topic of discussion.
But I have read the script in these blogs about women being scared of you and I laugh everytime I read that, apparently your either disillusioned about that or you keep meeting some women with rather weak characters, lol.
Good Luck with That
27 August, 2006 at 7:06 pm
Hello Tessa,
welcome back.
My first instinctive response is to say that it is a lot of bull shit about women saying no when they mean yes. There are quite a few american women that when they say NO really means a definite NO, and when they say YES it is a YES. But to be inconsistent, some women do exist that might say No when they mean Yes and that really screws things up for a woman who really, really means what she says. So it is not all bullshit.
Nice to hear that you might consider that what I write is not ALL bullshit. I do suspect that in the US women might be a bit more direct, but I am not sure if it’s such a good thing, as you seem to assume. Having multiple meaning in one answer is a sort of trademark of a feminine answer. And I would lose part of my attraction when a women answers in a way that is too much straightforward. It starts to sound like a male. Like one of my buddies. She then has good cards to become a good friend of me, but less good to become a lover.
But I have read the script in these blogs about women being scared of you and I laugh everytime I read that, apparently your either disillusioned about that or you keep meeting some women with rather weak characters, lol.
Gosh, every time, which means you read it more than one time. Aren’t you ashamed of yourself in passing the time in rereading such personal rant, on and on? But I am interested in your analysis. According to you there are only two possibilities. Such a lack of creativity to think of only two. You studied aristotelian logic? Now your two “tertium non datur” possibilities are that I am either disillusioned, or I keep on meeting women with rather weak characters.
Weak respect to what? In what scale? Because if my character would be strong, wouldn’t this automatically imply that their would fall more on the weak side. But let’s assume that this is not the case. After all I don’t believe in it myself. Then according to you I am rather disillusioned. How so?
In thinking they are scared? It’s not me who sais so. It is them. Each, independently, and consistently. The last one, one week ago.
So we have to accept that they are scared, because they say so. And who are we to judge their emotions. If this might help you my father too, some years ago would repeat me:
“You scare women, yes they are interested in you, but your intensity holds them away“.
But if they are scared, why so? How can I change this part which so heavily is affecting my life. I presented some possibilities. But no final one. Do you have other to add? Please share your knowledge.
2 September, 2006 at 4:58 pm
Hmmm…I am so surprised you answered me. I had to chuckle about that. One’s perception of another is not inherently the truth. Perception is altered just as quickly with a paradigm shift. New data is considered and an aha! reaction exists that brings new understanding and a shift in thinking. But yes, I found your site by accident when I did a search and read one of your passages. So I read others and I have come back to see if you posted any thing further which you had. And I have re-read to see new meaning.
Ok, I don’t think it really matters if I consider what you say is nonsense or not. The other day the word I could think of was bullshit, though I don’t normally use the word. I think if women were direct it would lessen the confusion about accusations of rape. A man may have sex with a woman who appears willing and able to be consensual but then later he hears he is accused of rape because she did say no. Or the woman has given mixed messages and questions arise out of it that. As for being too direct, I know a woman can still maintain the allure and the mystery while still giving clear signals of yes or no, without loosing essense of femininity.
Sarcasm, I think. I know I used some absolutes, which are automatically subject to a logical fallacy. Or just illogical.
And no I am not ashamed of myself for reading it unless you are ashamed of yourself for writing it. You did post it so it could be read and you did allow for comments. Yes,
I did mention two. As for my creativity, I could have gotten REALLY creative. But I kept my comments short. Oh, and I have read Aristotle plus others but when I was 14. I read and understood Shakespeare and Tennyson at 10. I had a hard time with Thomas Paine, he was very dry I thought.
Socrates said to question and question some more. Hmm.
I digress. Disillusioned or weak characters. Ok. If the women says it I guess you may not be disillusioned in the way of deluding yourself to puff up your own masculinity unless women who say they are scared of you disillusion you in the way of making an absolute that women as in every single woman on the planet is scared of you because they cannot handle the intensity. But absolute is illogical.
So weak characters…not personality but the core of a person is character. Courage is a strong trait. Courage is having fear but doing something anyway. Scared is scared.
So for these women to be scared of you, your intensity. I don’t know. Only thing I am scared of is spiders. It is not logical. I know this. But yet if one lands in my clothing I scream and my clothes come off so fast it isn’t funny. And yes, I did find a spider both times. So not just imagination.
So yea, guess it could be that. Sounds like you do have a strong presence, thus it could be that some women may be weaker than that, as you say, or just intimidating. But the woman are not getting scared and tearing off their clothes, but running away from you or do they flutter like a moth around a light. I don’t get what scares them, anyway.
So you scare some women and your intensity holds them away. So what? Maybe it is a good thing. Are you or would you really be comfortable with a woman who viewed your intensity as a fearsome thing? Or perhaps you choose women who would be scared of the intensity, who are too afraid to play with fire, because you really like that and may not want to admit that it meets some need in you to do so.
I can’t imagine being scared of you, probably why I was laughing about it before. Unless you resembled a spider.
Guess I could imagine it. (shudder) That really isn’t very pretty. So maybe I choose not to imagine it.
Ever had a quick pastry and maybe some tea or coffee, forgot a water bottle to slake the thirst then climbed a mountain? Or some other extreme physical activity? How long before you got weak or hungry or had your muscles just tremble with lack of nutrients? And if you ate properly like you were suppose to before such an industrious thing? And remembered to bring a water bottle to quench the thirst and keep hydrated. What happens then?
Lost in thought for a few minutes. Perception is a personal point of view, not a fact. It really matters very little what another thinks of you, what matter is what you think of you.
3 September, 2006 at 11:15 am
Tessa.
Yes, I try to answer people. Even to aggressive people, unless their intent is only obviously disruptive. Sometimes I am far from the internet, so it might take a while. If you do come back to read if I wrote more you should add my feed to your feed reader. I do tend to write only when I have things to say. It would be a shame if you grew disaffectionate just because I am not consistent in the times when I write.
I digress. Disillusioned or weak characters. Ok. If the women says it I guess you may not be disillusioned in the way of deluding yourself to puff up your own masculinity unless women who say they are scared of you disillusion you in the way of making an absolute that women as in every single woman on the planet is scared of you because they cannot handle the intensity. But absolute is illogical.
Nah, not every woman on the planet is scared of me. But when they are attracted to me, fear is always present. This is why it is more tied to their attraction (and the transformative effect that could have on them) than of me alone.
I fully agree with you that courage is the ability to feel fear and do things anyway. In fact this is how I lived most of my life from when I was 19 onward. That is fom when I followed my first course in meditation. I was at the time also told that we are afraid of the things we really desire, so fear soon became my compass, as well as my companion.
And it is for this reason that I am actually quite flattered that women are scared of me. I just wish they were more courageous. Then you ask if I would be comfortable with a woman who viewed your intensity as a fearsome thing?
It has happen, and I can assure that it was among the most intense experiences I have had. Women like that, when they decide to grapple with their internal demons, by going with me, are such a treasure! They never want long relationships, as they only use me to prove to themselves their strength. But their braveness, their generousity and their intensity is so extreme it forces me to give the best of myself.
Maany years ago I was, during the military service, I was making a guard in front of the parlament. Half way through it a school arrived. In this school there were many girls, and one of them started to be interested in me. She did not want me, but she wanted the man in the uniform, what she was projecting on me. All this was very clear to me. For some time she tried to give me her phone number by spelling it very slowly, while her companions were protecting her by avoiding the police men to see what she was doing. Me, I was concentrated in not laughing (it’s hard when you cannot move), and in trying to be for her what she so desperately desired me to be. She had no idea who was I (nor probably did I). But she tried to arrange a date nevertheless. She was grappling wit something inside herself.
Well those women are grappling with something inside herself. It’s not me, or in me. I am just mirroring something. What? I don’t know. I don’t even know if it is the same for all of them. But so few of them pass their own exam.
And me? I would just like to have a lively long term relationship.
How long before you got weak or hungry or had your muscles just tremble with lack of nutrients?
probably after about 2 hours of standing (Zhan Zhuang) my muscles start to shake.
And if you ate properly like you were suppose to before such an industrious thing? And remembered to bring a water bottle to quench the thirst and keep hydrated. What happens then?
I still get tired. But if I ate properly I only get tired. If I do not I also unbalance my internal equilibrium and feel extreme emotions unrelated to the situation, or my mind start spinning on its own.
Tessa, I think you should face you spider fear? What about finding a small spider in your living room and just playing with it? I am sure you were not afraid of spiders when you were a small kid, so somehow you must have learned it. Then you can unlearn it.
this spider
4 September, 2006 at 8:01 am
I have been on the go since 5am this morning and now it is around 10:30pm. I came online not too long ago to check some email. I clicked over here to read your response. I sat here thinking about it for a few minutes. You are right.
I was being aggressive. I did realize what I wrote but I did not realize the aggression inherent in it. I really do not know what to say as I am flabbergasted I was aggressive.
Aggression is not a trait I have actually experienced before.
I don’t even know why I even had the urge to comment at all as I have never done so prior to this. I will have to think about this.
I do not understand the feed reader comment. If I have one I have never used it before.
“But when they are attracted to me, fear is always present. This is why it is more tied to their attraction (and the transformative effect that could have on them) than of me alone.” What is this transformative effect suppose to be?
“Well those women are grappling with something inside herself. It’s not me, or in me. I am just mirroring something. What? I don’t know. I don’t even know if it is the same for all of them. But so few of them pass their own exam.” Same thing would be that they are scared of you.
So are you mirroring fear? And what about this self exam?
“And me? I would just like to have a lively long term relationship.” -> “I still get tired. But if I ate properly I only get tired. If I do not I also unbalance my internal equilibrium and feel extreme emotions unrelated to the situation, or my mind start spinning on its own.” I don’t know. Are you certain that being flattered by the women who are scared of you and enjoyment of brief, intense interludes doesn’t reward you for remaining as you are?
“Tessa, I think you should face you spider fear? What about finding a small spider in your living room and just playing with it? I am sure you were not afraid of spiders when you were a small kid, so somehow you must have learned it. Then you can unlearn it.” I know exactly the history of the
spider fear, knowing where I caught it, found it, what stuff it is made of and in process of sending it on its lovely way. And yes as a small child, I feared spiders but spiders were not the only things to fear.
Some venom in spiders can eat up flesh and muscle tissue leaving only the bone or kill one or just make one feel very ill.
But the person has to be sensitive to the venom to happen.
Goodnight, Tessa
8 September, 2006 at 10:37 am
[...] Tessa asked: “What is this transformative effect suppose to be?” [...]
8 September, 2006 at 11:00 am
Hello Tessa, sorry if I answered you so late, but going back to the office after summer holiday required me to stop dicking around with this blog and do some real work. But today is friday, so I can take a few hours off.
I am really surprised by your assertion: “Aggression is not a trait I have actually experienced before.”. Can I ask you how old are you? About?
I have answered your question about the transformative power of love at length in my last entry. I’ll try now to answer some of the other question you ask.
A feed reader is an aggregator, is a program to which you tell what are the websites you like, and checks them daily, to see if they have been updated. If they have been updated, it tells you. In this way you only need to check one place, instead of many. With a feed reader is quite common to keep an eye to maybe a hundred blog or website. Which by hand would be a full time job. A good basic feedreader is bloglines. But there are many others.
Are you certain that being flattered by the women who are scared of you and enjoyment of brief, intense interludes doesn’t reward you for remaining as you are?
It is surely rewarding, but in no way can it compare with the sensation to be loved, in love, in a sexually satisfying relationship. I have been there, I know how it feels like. I am not fantasizing about it, I am remembering it.
Spiders Com’on. You are putting up excuses to not face the irrationality fo your fear. There are plent of innoucuous spiders that are happy to play with you. Once you have recognised what spider are you dealing with you have no reason to be afraid anymore. I still think you should start keeping some spiders as pets. It would cure you.
Same thing would be that they are scared of you.
So are you mirroring fear? And what about this self exam?
Sorry, I cannot understand this comment, can you expand on it so that I can understand and maybe answer. Thanks.
this man
8 September, 2006 at 4:01 pm
Good Morning,
If I dismiss the fear of spiders then I would have nothing left to fear. So I choose to keep this fear for now. As everyone has to be afraid of something, I would rather fear
spiders than something that has greater impact on my life.
Hmmm…sometimes cures are worse than dealing with it
as naturally and as joyously as possible. Nah…no cures.
The feeder sounds like more work than just checking this one site when I feel like clicking on it. Maybe if I had lots I could see the time saving feature of this program.
Yea, aggression is just not something I deal with, I guess.
I would say majority of time, like 97% I am quietly assertive,
with maybe 2.9% passive/submissive and .1 aggressive. I
don’t give “jerks” more than 5 minutes of my thoughts or of my time. Plus if I do get angry I start crying and that is really totally bloody unfair, as I think if somebody is gonna go to the trouble of getting angry one should seem like it.
As for my age, I like my thirties very much. Every year of my life is more wonderful and better than the year before.
How young/old are you?
“Well those women are grappling with something inside herself. It’s not me, or in me. I am just mirroring something. What? I don’t know. I don’t even know if it is the same for all of them. But so few of them pass their own exam.” My statement and questions of “Same thing would be that they are scared of you. So are you mirroring fear? And what about this self exam?” I was asking for clarification
of your own statements that you made in the prior record.
AS for work, must commute 1 minute to work. Gotta go.
Tessa
8 September, 2006 at 5:07 pm
Good day.
I am in my thirties too.
Pretty much half way.
Ok, I try to clarify what I said before:
“Well those women are grappling with something inside herself. It’s not me, or in me. I am just mirroring something. What? I don’t know. I don’t even know if it is the same for all of them. But so few of them pass their own exam.”
first of all there was a grammar error which might have confused you. It should have been “inside themselves”. Each of those women is afraid. I don’t know what are they afraid of, but some of them eventually decide that they want to face their own fear. They still don’t tell me what their fear is, but I can see in their face the decision. As I said, I don’t even know if they all are afraid of the same thing. So they have set up an exam to themselves. Will they prove themselves brave enough or will they run away when confronted with the fear they are dealing. I am not the one putting the exam, I am not the one judging. I am simply a person who happen to be the trigger for whatever they project in me. So they come to me, and I can feel that they are just there to prove to themselves that they are not afraid. If they pass the exam (we kiss, have sex, whatever) they go away with the feeling that they made it. If they don’t pass the exam they run away or just say that eventually they changed their mind about me. If before all this drama gets played I ask them what they feel about me they will often say ‘fear’. Or I am not sure, but something I am not confortable with.
In any case after they set up the exam, run the show they leave. And I remain thinking: what should I do to let those people be confortable with me, without automatically becoming their last friend-confident, like I use to when I was sixteen.
Does this clarify what I meant?
this man
11 September, 2006 at 6:58 am
Mmmmm. Interesting. Believe it is clarified. YES!
But then again I have had such a lovely, lovely weekend away from home I am still floating on clouds and would
no doubt just smile sublimely in agreement with most things
just about now.
Tessa
29 October, 2006 at 1:58 pm
You’ve hit on longstanding truth, that for some reason is a touchy subject to some. There can be a pleasure in willfully being dominated.
I have a lover who says “stop, stop, stop!” as a code word that really means “faster, harder, rougher, take me!” as she is getting closer to orgasm.
There is nothing politically incorect in the natural dynamic of taking charge being a turn on.
29 October, 2006 at 2:05 pm
I just want to add, that when a woman says no, meaning yes or maybe, an experienced man can easily tell this from a no that means no. Body language speaks clearly. Some people want to underestimate our capacity to know which no is a no and which isn’t.
I’m not irritated by the no’s that don’t mean no. They are fun. Gives me the opportunity to be Alpha, which is fun. Just part of the game.
I was so clueless when I lived in the west though. So sensitive and caring and egalitarian. No wonder I was too often lonely there.
26 April, 2007 at 12:43 am
I recognize this what do women really mean when they say “no” debate is a long and popular one. With that said, I think the debate about what a woman really means when she says no, or yes is irrelevant.
A person, independent of gender is capable of wanting to do something and still choosing not to do it. For example wanting an extra helping of double chocolate devil fudge cake is one thing. Eating it or not eating it is a decision based on factors beyond “want”,such as what is healthy, convenient or appropriate at the moment.
Wanting a pair of divine Manolo Blahnik for $600 is a strong desire, but saying Yes to the want can be financially devastating for some, or a simple indulgence for another.
Wanting to do something and still saying No isn’t being wishy washy, or hypocritical, or confused or even being scared. And the reasons behind the No, really aren’t anyone’s business, all that matters, is the word No, its own bad self.
At least, thats how I see it.
26 April, 2007 at 12:47 am
PS in answer to Tessa somewhere above Man wrote: So we have to accept that they are scared, because they say so. And who are we to judge their emotions.
beautifully stated.
27 April, 2007 at 9:09 pm
Hazel, you assume that the thinking process is linear. First she decides, then she carries out her decision, and finally she remembers both.
And you also assume that if a man where to simply ask he would get laid.
Both assumptions are false.
Regarding the first:
This is hardly correct. What actually happens is that unless a person is presented with an extreme case (violent rape, or similar) a person will generally rewrite the story of what has happened to fit his values and the inner narrative he pr she is trying believe about themselves. If you seduce a woman she will not think: he seduced me. She will think, I liked him, and SO I made love with him. Or I could not resist him. In both cases the story fits her self image.
Regarding the second:
Still if a man could just ask for some sex and get it, then who cares about female circular logic (we both have circular logic, but women are really master at this). But this is unfortunately not so. And you need to trust me on this. And all your male friends. The fact is that “A man who asks will get NO sex”. Asking for sex is the biggest turn off I have ever seen in action. A woman would rather have sex with a drunken man who is throwing up than with a man who is begging to have sex. Unless, of course, he was her lover before. And still he would lose points by asking and begging.
It is hardwired.
There are evolutionary reasons why it is so, but not enter into this for now.
So a woman who sais no might be following a previous decision. But if she had the time to think the situation and in clear clod logic decide then the man have already lost the battle. Because no woman will decide in cold logic to have sex. They are brought to it against their “worse” rationale discernment. There are off course exceptions: women who want to get married, who do itas a bargain, who are married and so on. But this is a very small percentage of the new sex that happens.
28 April, 2007 at 2:16 am
ROTFLMAO!
This man wrote:
Hazel, you assume that the thinking process is linear.
Thats about the funniest thing anyone’s said about me in a long time. Its alright you don’t know me from eve so you’re allowed to make a few mistakes. Linear thinking? Me? Ahahahaaaa! snort.
Firstly my informed opinion is not an assumption. I am a woman who has had to say no a few times when really wanting to say Oh YES rock my socks off baby! Why did I say no? Because of all sorts of random reasons. A boyfriend in standing an arms length away, a boyfriend, hairy legs, being on the rag, having a bus to catch. Whatever.
My point was wanting and doing are two different things and sometimes what we want to do isn’t good for us, and that knowledge alone, is enough to dissuade most rational people into a “No” answer.
My opinion was, and still is the why of the no is less important than the actual word of no. Basically if she says no just accept it and stop beating yourself up over it move on to the next honey bee who is more receptive.
As for the next statement by This Man
you also assume that if a man where to simply ask he would get laid.
Again sorry just blowing tea out my nose here, this one was really entertaining.
Where in the world did you get that statement from? I re read my post and uh see nothing there suggesting such an assumption on my part.
I am very much aware that a man, even a married man will likely get a drop dead reaction to such a naked proposition. Its just I don’t know, yucky.
As for this:
A woman would rather have sex with a drunken man who is throwing up than with a man who is begging to have sex. Unless, of course, he was her lover before. And still he would lose points by asking and begging.
It is hardwired.
First next time you spout off about other people’s assumptions take a look in the mirror.
that last thing i just copied of yours? Outrageous, and disgusting and doesn’t describe a single woman I’ve ever known.
This Man:
Because no woman will decide in cold logic to have sex. They are brought to it against their “worse” rationale discernment. There are off course exceptions: women who want to get married, who do itas a bargain, who are married and so on. But this is a very small percentage of the new sex that happens.
OMG. I feel really bad for you.
But this here? pretty much says it all, as to why you’re not getting any…
Still if a man could just ask for some sex and get it, then who cares about female circular logic (we both have circular logic, but women are really master at this).
Oh Yeah? Well rotate on this!
Hows that for female logic?
28 April, 2007 at 8:54 am
OMG, you must really like me to invest so much time in writing a comment on my blog.
Basically if she says no just accept it and stop beating yourself up over it move on to the next honey bee who is more receptive.
This is incorrect. And it is only ok in your fantasies. Being a woman you have NO experience about how it is to be a man, and what strategies work and what do not. A ‘no’ have to be taken as feedback or it will just be followed by another ‘no’, and another ‘no’.
Where in the world did you get that statement from?
Well, generally from your comments transpires a basic assumption that there is nothing that have to be done to have sex for a man. He just need to move on to the next honeybee. Because women want to fall and not to get tripped. I might have misunderstood what according for you a man must do to have sex. But I claim that you are grossly underextimating tha amount of work that a man needs to put in to change himself to have start to have sex in a consistent way. You basically have no idea. You think you know, but you do not know.
Outrageous, and disgusting and doesn’t describe a single woman I’ve ever known.
It surely does not describe the way any woman likes to think of herself.
OMG. I feel really bad for you.
But this here? pretty much says it all, as to why you’re not getting any…
I am not getting any? Well spotted, not.
Lately, from when I trashed the female logic that brought me up, I am finally getting the sex that I need. Although I am still far from the level of mastery I wish to attain I feel I am getting even with the years of solitary desire.
3 November, 2007 at 8:08 am
I don’t understand why so many women go crazy for Manolos.